More on Retention of Critical Life Saving Skills Over Time.

The American Heart Association in their 2015 guidelines again notes that retention of life saving CPR skills and knowledge is a significant problem for both lay rescuers and healthcare providers. Retention of CPR (both BLS and ACLS) skills over time has long been known to suffer.
For example, Ackerman (2009) noted that knowledge retention of key aspects of high quality CPR decreased significantly within 3 months in both a standardized CPR trained group, and one trained using high fidelity simulation.
Burkhardt, Glick, and Terndrup (2014) performed a study showing that CPR knowledge retention significantly improved performance skills. Therefore knowledge retention equals skills retention. The conclusion is that more consistent reinforcement may help, as generally, even experienced providers performed sub-optimal CPR.
In a similar study by Montgomery, Kardong-Edgren, et al, (2012), students were randomized into Heartcode BLS groups and instructor led groups. Students were more satisfied with the instructor led groups, but ultimately, the students that felt most confident in CPR skills were those with monthly refreshers.
A significant amount of research has gone into identifying the type of training which may lead to more knowledge and skills retention- instructor led, versus voice activated manikins, high or low fidelity simulation, but there is a growing body of research that suggests perhaps the more important component of skills retention is not how a student is trained, but how OFTEN.
Traditional AHA CPR certification requires re-training every 2 years, but with multiple studies(Ackerman, etc.) showing significant reduction in skills mastery and knowledge retention within 3 months, research has taken on the question of how to maintain those skills several months out from a required 2 year CPR refresher.
Sutton et al (2011) showed that brief, frequent (monthly) skills re-training sessions significantly boosted CPR quality in skills sessions. Instructor led re- training was better than automated feedback training alone.
Sullivan (2015) after a review of a large number of CPR retention articles, ultimately found that all types of learning were generally effective at providing initial skills. Studies showed the largest retention of skills when provided brief, frequent refreshers. Either high or low fidelity simulation sessions, followed by debrief and repeat practice aid in knowledge and skills retention over time.
Perhaps it is time to re-think traditional 2 year CPR training, and provide the opportunity for staff to practice regularly on their unit by participating in mock codes, or even using a voice assisted manikin during breaks in patient care.
Learn, Enjoy and Save Life. HealthForce Training Center offer services such as Basic Life Support (BLS), Advance Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), Pediatric Advance Life Support (PALS), CPR AED, Pediatric First Aid CPR AED and First Aid CPR AED. Read more of our blogs.
Source(s):
References
Ackermann, A. D. (2009). Investigation of learning outcomes for the acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills learned with the use of high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(6), e213-e222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.002
Burkhardt, J. N., Glick, J. E., & Turndrup, T. E. (2014). Effect of prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge on compression performance by hospital providers. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(4), 404-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.1.19636
Montgomery, C., Kardong-Edgren, S. E., Oermann, M. H., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2012). Student satisfaction and self report of CPR competency: HeartCode BLS courses, instructor-led CPR courses, and monthly voice advisory manikin practice for CPR skill maintenance. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/1548-923X.2361
Oermann, M. H., Kardong-Edgren, S., Odom-Maryon, T., Hallmark, B. F., Hurd, D., Rogers, N., ... Smart, D. A. (2011). Deliberate practice of motor skills in nursing education: CPR as exemplar. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(5), 311-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.5.311
Sullivan, N. (2015). An integrative review: Instructional strategies to improve nurses’ retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation priorities. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2014-0012
Sutton, R. M., Niles, D., Meaney, P. A., Aplenc, R., French, B., Abella, B. S., ... Nadkarni, V. (2011). Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of in-hospital pediatric providers. Pediatrics, 128(1), e145-e151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2105
Travers, A. H., Rea, T. D., Edelson, B. J., Berg, D. P., Sayre, M. R., Berg, M. D., ... Swor, R. A. (2010). Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 122(3), S676-S684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913





Mình bắt đầu xem website nhận định kèo nhà cái này từ một bài được nhắc đến trong phần tài liệu liên quan của nội dung mình đang tìm hiểu. Sau khi đọc xong, mình mở thêm vài bài khác và thấy cách chia nội dung khá hợp lý, những thông tin chính dễ nhận ra mà không cần đọc quá lâu. Việc chuyển giữa các bài cũng nhanh và ít thao tác. Mình chủ yếu sử dụng bằng điện thoại nhưng trang vẫn hiển thị rõ, cuộn và đọc khá thoải mái. Nhìn chung, đây là một trang khá thuận tiện để mình xem thêm thông tin khi cần.
Thinking about building a personal connection with words, I find the smaller practical questions more interesting than a quick conclusion. A single remembered detail can give a short piece of writing a clearer sense of place. That is why the connection between Premioletterarioluisaronconi and reading and creative writing makes me want to think through an example. I would be interested in an example that shows how the idea works in an ordinary situation. What would you keep when shortening a story without losing its atmosphere?
Khi đang đọc một số bình luận trong một cuộc thảo luận trên mạng, mình tình cờ thấy http://iwin-club.plus được nhắc đến giữa nội dung. Mình tò mò nên bấm thử vào xem, chủ yếu muốn quan sát cách giao diện được thiết kế và các phần được bố trí. Lướt nhanh thì thấy tổng thể khá đơn giản, từng khu vực cũng tương đối dễ phân biệt. Mình chỉ xem sơ qua rồi quay lại đọc tiếp những bình luận đang theo dõi.
Considering thinking about how spaces and furniture are used, I would want to understand a few concrete details before deciding what matters most. A room works differently when its layout reflects the activities people actually do there. With Pohistvo Vidmajer in mind, everyday interior design feels like a topic worth exploring one question at a time. I would rather explore one useful example carefully than pretend that the whole subject is already clear. What would you observe before deciding which part of a space to change?
mình từng thấy 79King vài lần nhưng gần đây mới có thời gian ấn vào xem kỹ hơn một chút. Mình chủ yếu quan sát bố cục địa phương và cách các phần thông tin được đặt trên trang. Tổng thể khá thoáng nên việc xác định từng khu vực không bị mất nhiều thời gian, thao tác chuyển mục cũng phản hồi nhanh. Nội dung hiển thị gọn gàng, dễ theo dõi, thanh menu đặt ở vị trí dễ thấy nên việc chuyển qua lại giữa các mục cũng khá nhanh. Khi truy cập bằng điện thoại, trang vẫn hoạt động ổn định, thao tác mượt.