More on Retention of Critical Life Saving Skills Over Time.
- Oct 17, 2021
- 3 min read

The American Heart Association in their 2015 guidelines again notes that retention of life saving CPR skills and knowledge is a significant problem for both lay rescuers and healthcare providers. Retention of CPR (both BLS and ACLS) skills over time has long been known to suffer.
For example, Ackerman (2009) noted that knowledge retention of key aspects of high quality CPR decreased significantly within 3 months in both a standardized CPR trained group, and one trained using high fidelity simulation.
Burkhardt, Glick, and Terndrup (2014) performed a study showing that CPR knowledge retention significantly improved performance skills. Therefore knowledge retention equals skills retention. The conclusion is that more consistent reinforcement may help, as generally, even experienced providers performed sub-optimal CPR.
In a similar study by Montgomery, Kardong-Edgren, et al, (2012), students were randomized into Heartcode BLS groups and instructor led groups. Students were more satisfied with the instructor led groups, but ultimately, the students that felt most confident in CPR skills were those with monthly refreshers.
A significant amount of research has gone into identifying the type of training which may lead to more knowledge and skills retention- instructor led, versus voice activated manikins, high or low fidelity simulation, but there is a growing body of research that suggests perhaps the more important component of skills retention is not how a student is trained, but how OFTEN.
Traditional AHA CPR certification requires re-training every 2 years, but with multiple studies(Ackerman, etc.) showing significant reduction in skills mastery and knowledge retention within 3 months, research has taken on the question of how to maintain those skills several months out from a required 2 year CPR refresher.
Sutton et al (2011) showed that brief, frequent (monthly) skills re-training sessions significantly boosted CPR quality in skills sessions. Instructor led re- training was better than automated feedback training alone.
Sullivan (2015) after a review of a large number of CPR retention articles, ultimately found that all types of learning were generally effective at providing initial skills. Studies showed the largest retention of skills when provided brief, frequent refreshers. Either high or low fidelity simulation sessions, followed by debrief and repeat practice aid in knowledge and skills retention over time.
Perhaps it is time to re-think traditional 2 year CPR training, and provide the opportunity for staff to practice regularly on their unit by participating in mock codes, or even using a voice assisted manikin during breaks in patient care.
Learn, Enjoy and Save Life. HealthForce Training Center offer services such as Basic Life Support (BLS), Advance Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), Pediatric Advance Life Support (PALS), CPR AED, Pediatric First Aid CPR AED and First Aid CPR AED. Read more of our blogs.
Source(s):
References
Ackermann, A. D. (2009). Investigation of learning outcomes for the acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills learned with the use of high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(6), e213-e222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.002
Burkhardt, J. N., Glick, J. E., & Turndrup, T. E. (2014). Effect of prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge on compression performance by hospital providers. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(4), 404-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.1.19636
Montgomery, C., Kardong-Edgren, S. E., Oermann, M. H., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2012). Student satisfaction and self report of CPR competency: HeartCode BLS courses, instructor-led CPR courses, and monthly voice advisory manikin practice for CPR skill maintenance. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/1548-923X.2361
Oermann, M. H., Kardong-Edgren, S., Odom-Maryon, T., Hallmark, B. F., Hurd, D., Rogers, N., ... Smart, D. A. (2011). Deliberate practice of motor skills in nursing education: CPR as exemplar. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(5), 311-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.5.311
Sullivan, N. (2015). An integrative review: Instructional strategies to improve nurses’ retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation priorities. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2014-0012
Sutton, R. M., Niles, D., Meaney, P. A., Aplenc, R., French, B., Abella, B. S., ... Nadkarni, V. (2011). Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of in-hospital pediatric providers. Pediatrics, 128(1), e145-e151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2105
Travers, A. H., Rea, T. D., Edelson, B. J., Berg, D. P., Sayre, M. R., Berg, M. D., ... Swor, R. A. (2010). Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 122(3), S676-S684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913





Đang lướt qua một số chủ đề khác, mình tiện mở jw88 để tham khảo cách trình bày. Mình không tìm hiểu quá sâu mà tập trung vào bố cục chung, các mục nổi bật và cách thông tin được bố trí. Giao diện nhìn khá gọn, các phần chính dễ nhận biết nên xem nhanh cũng không mất nhiều thời gian. Sau đó mình chuyển sang đọc tiếp những nội dung khác.
Sau khi thấy một số người chia sẻ, mình cũng vào RR88 xem qua để tham khảo cách họ làm giao diện và chia chuyên mục. Cảm nhận ban đầu là trang web trình bày rất mạch lạc, bố cục cân đối và chia khu vực rõ ràng nên nhìn rất thoáng mắt. Thanh điều hướng cũng được làm trực quan, hiển thị đủ danh mục nên hoạt động hay chuyển đổi giữa các phần nội dung cực nhanh và thuận tiện.
Very interesting post! It definitely cleared up a few questions I had in mind. Kitchen Tool Scout reviews
Thank you for breaking down this topic so clearly. Excellent post! beauty technology reviews
Khi xem qua khu vực trang chủ tg88 trên trang tôi chú ý trước tiên đến cách giao diện phân chia lượng thông tin thành từng nhóm riêng. Tôi quan sát khoảng cách giữa các khu vực và cách tên cùng hình ảnh được đặt tách biệt với phần mô tả. Cách phân tầng như vậy giúp mắt dễ xác định nội dung cần xem hơn. Khi chuyển sang những phần khác tôi cũng chú ý xem quy luật trình bày có được duy trì đồng nhất hay không.