More on Retention of Critical Life Saving Skills Over Time.

The American Heart Association in their 2015 guidelines again notes that retention of life saving CPR skills and knowledge is a significant problem for both lay rescuers and healthcare providers. Retention of CPR (both BLS and ACLS) skills over time has long been known to suffer.
For example, Ackerman (2009) noted that knowledge retention of key aspects of high quality CPR decreased significantly within 3 months in both a standardized CPR trained group, and one trained using high fidelity simulation.
Burkhardt, Glick, and Terndrup (2014) performed a study showing that CPR knowledge retention significantly improved performance skills. Therefore knowledge retention equals skills retention. The conclusion is that more consistent reinforcement may help, as generally, even experienced providers performed sub-optimal CPR.
In a similar study by Montgomery, Kardong-Edgren, et al, (2012), students were randomized into Heartcode BLS groups and instructor led groups. Students were more satisfied with the instructor led groups, but ultimately, the students that felt most confident in CPR skills were those with monthly refreshers.
A significant amount of research has gone into identifying the type of training which may lead to more knowledge and skills retention- instructor led, versus voice activated manikins, high or low fidelity simulation, but there is a growing body of research that suggests perhaps the more important component of skills retention is not how a student is trained, but how OFTEN.
Traditional AHA CPR certification requires re-training every 2 years, but with multiple studies(Ackerman, etc.) showing significant reduction in skills mastery and knowledge retention within 3 months, research has taken on the question of how to maintain those skills several months out from a required 2 year CPR refresher.
Sutton et al (2011) showed that brief, frequent (monthly) skills re-training sessions significantly boosted CPR quality in skills sessions. Instructor led re- training was better than automated feedback training alone.
Sullivan (2015) after a review of a large number of CPR retention articles, ultimately found that all types of learning were generally effective at providing initial skills. Studies showed the largest retention of skills when provided brief, frequent refreshers. Either high or low fidelity simulation sessions, followed by debrief and repeat practice aid in knowledge and skills retention over time.
Perhaps it is time to re-think traditional 2 year CPR training, and provide the opportunity for staff to practice regularly on their unit by participating in mock codes, or even using a voice assisted manikin during breaks in patient care.
Learn, Enjoy and Save Life. HealthForce Training Center offer services such as Basic Life Support (BLS), Advance Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), Pediatric Advance Life Support (PALS), CPR AED, Pediatric First Aid CPR AED and First Aid CPR AED. Read more of our blogs.
Source(s):
References
Ackermann, A. D. (2009). Investigation of learning outcomes for the acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills learned with the use of high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(6), e213-e222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.002
Burkhardt, J. N., Glick, J. E., & Turndrup, T. E. (2014). Effect of prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge on compression performance by hospital providers. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(4), 404-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.1.19636
Montgomery, C., Kardong-Edgren, S. E., Oermann, M. H., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2012). Student satisfaction and self report of CPR competency: HeartCode BLS courses, instructor-led CPR courses, and monthly voice advisory manikin practice for CPR skill maintenance. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/1548-923X.2361
Oermann, M. H., Kardong-Edgren, S., Odom-Maryon, T., Hallmark, B. F., Hurd, D., Rogers, N., ... Smart, D. A. (2011). Deliberate practice of motor skills in nursing education: CPR as exemplar. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(5), 311-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.5.311
Sullivan, N. (2015). An integrative review: Instructional strategies to improve nurses’ retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation priorities. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2014-0012
Sutton, R. M., Niles, D., Meaney, P. A., Aplenc, R., French, B., Abella, B. S., ... Nadkarni, V. (2011). Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of in-hospital pediatric providers. Pediatrics, 128(1), e145-e151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2105
Travers, A. H., Rea, T. D., Edelson, B. J., Berg, D. P., Sayre, M. R., Berg, M. D., ... Swor, R. A. (2010). Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 122(3), S676-S684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913





Trước đây mình từng thấy https://sodo66.land/ vài lần nhưng gần đây mới có thời gian bấm vào xem kỹ hơn một chút. Mình chủ yếu quan sát bố cục và cách các phần thông tin được đặt trên trang. Tổng thể khá thoáng nên việc xác định từng khu vực không mất nhiều thời gian, thao tác chuyển mục cũng phản hồi nhanh. Mình chưa sử dụng lâu nên muốn hỏi thêm các bác đã theo dõi thường xuyên xem trải nghiệm thực tế thế nào.
Có lúc mình cần thêm nguồn tham khảo nên ghé fly888 xem sơ bộ trong vài phút. Mình chú ý đến giao diện, cách phân chia danh mục cùng vị trí các nội dung trên trang. Ấn tượng ban đầu khá thoáng và dễ nhìn, sau khi xem một lượt mình tiếp tục quay lại phần thông tin đang tìm kiếm.
This was straightforward and not too promotional. I’ll keep https://www.tttjl.club/ together with this article when checking more on sports updates and comparison notes. The compact experience angle makes it useful for a later check.
I visited the tttjl website after seeing it mentioned in a few pieces of content online, mainly to get some inspiration from the way they designed the interface and organized the information. My initial impression was that the website is very well-structured, with a balanced layout and clearly defined sections, making it feel clean and easy on the eyes. When accessed on a mobile device, the website also works smoothly and is relatively easy to navigate. Overall, it gives a simple and user-friendly impression.
Khi trải nghiệm tttjl mình chú ý đến cách hiển thị danh sách trận và những thông tin đi kèm. Việc phân chia nội dung thành từng khu vực giúp mình nhanh chóng tìm được chuyên mục cần quan sát. Mình thử mở một trận rồi quay lại danh sách để lựa chọn nội dung khác. Các mục điều hướng tương đối dễ nhận biết nên không mất nhiều thời gian làm quen. Ngoài ra, cách trình bày tiêu đề và thông tin trận cũng ảnh hưởng khá rõ đến khả năng tìm kiếm. Nhìn chung, bố cục gọn giúp mình dễ theo dõi nhiều nội dung bóng đá trong cùng một lần truy cập.