More on Retention of Critical Life Saving Skills Over Time.
- oliver591
- Oct 17, 2021
- 3 min read

The American Heart Association in their 2015 guidelines again notes that retention of life saving CPR skills and knowledge is a significant problem for both lay rescuers and healthcare providers. Retention of CPR (both BLS and ACLS) skills over time has long been known to suffer.
For example, Ackerman (2009) noted that knowledge retention of key aspects of high quality CPR decreased significantly within 3 months in both a standardized CPR trained group, and one trained using high fidelity simulation.
Burkhardt, Glick, and Terndrup (2014) performed a study showing that CPR knowledge retention significantly improved performance skills. Therefore knowledge retention equals skills retention. The conclusion is that more consistent reinforcement may help, as generally, even experienced providers performed sub-optimal CPR.
In a similar study by Montgomery, Kardong-Edgren, et al, (2012), students were randomized into Heartcode BLS groups and instructor led groups. Students were more satisfied with the instructor led groups, but ultimately, the students that felt most confident in CPR skills were those with monthly refreshers.
A significant amount of research has gone into identifying the type of training which may lead to more knowledge and skills retention- instructor led, versus voice activated manikins, high or low fidelity simulation, but there is a growing body of research that suggests perhaps the more important component of skills retention is not how a student is trained, but how OFTEN.
Traditional AHA CPR certification requires re-training every 2 years, but with multiple studies(Ackerman, etc.) showing significant reduction in skills mastery and knowledge retention within 3 months, research has taken on the question of how to maintain those skills several months out from a required 2 year CPR refresher.
Sutton et al (2011) showed that brief, frequent (monthly) skills re-training sessions significantly boosted CPR quality in skills sessions. Instructor led re- training was better than automated feedback training alone.
Sullivan (2015) after a review of a large number of CPR retention articles, ultimately found that all types of learning were generally effective at providing initial skills. Studies showed the largest retention of skills when provided brief, frequent refreshers. Either high or low fidelity simulation sessions, followed by debrief and repeat practice aid in knowledge and skills retention over time.
Perhaps it is time to re-think traditional 2 year CPR training, and provide the opportunity for staff to practice regularly on their unit by participating in mock codes, or even using a voice assisted manikin during breaks in patient care.
Learn, Enjoy and Save Life. HealthForce Training Center offer services such as Basic Life Support (BLS), Advance Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), Pediatric Advance Life Support (PALS), CPR AED, Pediatric First Aid CPR AED and First Aid CPR AED. Read more of our blogs.
Source(s):
References
Ackermann, A. D. (2009). Investigation of learning outcomes for the acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills learned with the use of high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(6), e213-e222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.002
Burkhardt, J. N., Glick, J. E., & Turndrup, T. E. (2014). Effect of prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge on compression performance by hospital providers. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(4), 404-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.1.19636
Montgomery, C., Kardong-Edgren, S. E., Oermann, M. H., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2012). Student satisfaction and self report of CPR competency: HeartCode BLS courses, instructor-led CPR courses, and monthly voice advisory manikin practice for CPR skill maintenance. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/1548-923X.2361
Oermann, M. H., Kardong-Edgren, S., Odom-Maryon, T., Hallmark, B. F., Hurd, D., Rogers, N., ... Smart, D. A. (2011). Deliberate practice of motor skills in nursing education: CPR as exemplar. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(5), 311-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.5.311
Sullivan, N. (2015). An integrative review: Instructional strategies to improve nurses’ retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation priorities. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2014-0012
Sutton, R. M., Niles, D., Meaney, P. A., Aplenc, R., French, B., Abella, B. S., ... Nadkarni, V. (2011). Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of in-hospital pediatric providers. Pediatrics, 128(1), e145-e151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2105
Travers, A. H., Rea, T. D., Edelson, B. J., Berg, D. P., Sayre, M. R., Berg, M. D., ... Swor, R. A. (2010). Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 122(3), S676-S684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913





Có lần mình đang đọc dở một bài tổng hợp thì thấy 33WIN xuất hiện giữa phần trao đổi, nên tiện bấm vào xem thử cho biết. Mình chỉ xem nhanh để cảm nhận cách trình bày chung chứ chưa đi sâu nội dung. Ấn tượng ban đầu là cách sắp xếp khá rõ ràng, nhìn tổng thể dễ theo dõi và không gây rối.
Khi xem qua một vài bài viết gần đây, mình bắt gặp CM88 nên tiện ghé vào xem thử. Mình chỉ dành ít phút quan sát cách sắp xếp và trình bày chung, chưa tìm hiểu sâu nội dung. Ấn tượng ban đầu là bố cục khá rõ ràng, trình bày gọn gàng nên nhìn vào cũng dễ theo dõi.
Ban đầu mình chỉ vô tình thấy RR88 xuất hiện trong vài cuộc bàn luận nên tiện tay mở thử khi đang rảnh. Không có ý tìm hiểu kỹ, mình chủ yếu xem nhanh để hình dung tổng thể nội dung bên trong. Cảm nhận cá nhân là thông tin được trình bày khá mạch lạc, xem thoáng qua cũng đủ hiểu những điểm chính cần biết.
Mình có bắt gặp một số ý kiến trên mạng có nhắc tới Đất Nền Dragon Eden nên nảy sinh tò mò và ghé xem thử. Mình chỉ dành một khoảng thời gian ngắn để quan sát bố cục và cách trình bày tổng thể. Cảm nhận ban đầu là trang được trình bày khá gọn gàng, các phần được chia rõ ràng, giúp việc nắm bắt thông tin diễn ra khá thuận tiện.
Trong lúc tra cứu thông tin trên mạng. Mình tình cờ thấy https://rr88m1.com/ được nhắc đến ở khá nhiều nơi. Vì tò mò nên mình vào xem thử. Chỉ dành ít thời gian lướt qua, chủ yếu quan sát cách sắp xếp nội dung. Cảm nhận ban đầu là giao diện trình bày khá gọn, các mục được chia rõ ràng, nên việc tiếp cận và theo dõi thông tin cũng tương đối thuận tiện.