More on Retention of Critical Life Saving Skills Over Time.
- Oct 17, 2021
- 3 min read

The American Heart Association in their 2015 guidelines again notes that retention of life saving CPR skills and knowledge is a significant problem for both lay rescuers and healthcare providers. Retention of CPR (both BLS and ACLS) skills over time has long been known to suffer.
For example, Ackerman (2009) noted that knowledge retention of key aspects of high quality CPR decreased significantly within 3 months in both a standardized CPR trained group, and one trained using high fidelity simulation.
Burkhardt, Glick, and Terndrup (2014) performed a study showing that CPR knowledge retention significantly improved performance skills. Therefore knowledge retention equals skills retention. The conclusion is that more consistent reinforcement may help, as generally, even experienced providers performed sub-optimal CPR.
In a similar study by Montgomery, Kardong-Edgren, et al, (2012), students were randomized into Heartcode BLS groups and instructor led groups. Students were more satisfied with the instructor led groups, but ultimately, the students that felt most confident in CPR skills were those with monthly refreshers.
A significant amount of research has gone into identifying the type of training which may lead to more knowledge and skills retention- instructor led, versus voice activated manikins, high or low fidelity simulation, but there is a growing body of research that suggests perhaps the more important component of skills retention is not how a student is trained, but how OFTEN.
Traditional AHA CPR certification requires re-training every 2 years, but with multiple studies(Ackerman, etc.) showing significant reduction in skills mastery and knowledge retention within 3 months, research has taken on the question of how to maintain those skills several months out from a required 2 year CPR refresher.
Sutton et al (2011) showed that brief, frequent (monthly) skills re-training sessions significantly boosted CPR quality in skills sessions. Instructor led re- training was better than automated feedback training alone.
Sullivan (2015) after a review of a large number of CPR retention articles, ultimately found that all types of learning were generally effective at providing initial skills. Studies showed the largest retention of skills when provided brief, frequent refreshers. Either high or low fidelity simulation sessions, followed by debrief and repeat practice aid in knowledge and skills retention over time.
Perhaps it is time to re-think traditional 2 year CPR training, and provide the opportunity for staff to practice regularly on their unit by participating in mock codes, or even using a voice assisted manikin during breaks in patient care.
Learn, Enjoy and Save Life. HealthForce Training Center offer services such as Basic Life Support (BLS), Advance Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), Pediatric Advance Life Support (PALS), CPR AED, Pediatric First Aid CPR AED and First Aid CPR AED. Read more of our blogs.
Source(s):
References
Ackermann, A. D. (2009). Investigation of learning outcomes for the acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills learned with the use of high-fidelity simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 5(6), e213-e222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2009.05.002
Burkhardt, J. N., Glick, J. E., & Turndrup, T. E. (2014). Effect of prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation knowledge on compression performance by hospital providers. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 15(4), 404-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2014.1.19636
Montgomery, C., Kardong-Edgren, S. E., Oermann, M. H., & Odom-Maryon, T. (2012). Student satisfaction and self report of CPR competency: HeartCode BLS courses, instructor-led CPR courses, and monthly voice advisory manikin practice for CPR skill maintenance. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 9(1), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/1548-923X.2361
Oermann, M. H., Kardong-Edgren, S., Odom-Maryon, T., Hallmark, B. F., Hurd, D., Rogers, N., ... Smart, D. A. (2011). Deliberate practice of motor skills in nursing education: CPR as exemplar. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(5), 311-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-32.5.311
Sullivan, N. (2015). An integrative review: Instructional strategies to improve nurses’ retention of cardiopulmonary resuscitation priorities. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 12(1), 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2014-0012
Sutton, R. M., Niles, D., Meaney, P. A., Aplenc, R., French, B., Abella, B. S., ... Nadkarni, V. (2011). Low-dose, high-frequency CPR training improves skill retention of in-hospital pediatric providers. Pediatrics, 128(1), e145-e151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-2105
Travers, A. H., Rea, T. D., Edelson, B. J., Berg, D. P., Sayre, M. R., Berg, M. D., ... Swor, R. A. (2010). Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation, 122(3), S676-S684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913





Mình tình cờ biết tới F168 khi đọc qua một vài trao đổi trên mạng, thấy nhiều người nhắc nên cũng thử mở xem lúc rảnh. Mình không đi sâu vào chi tiết, chủ yếu lướt nhanh để nắm bố cục và cách sắp xếp nội dung tổng thể. Cảm nhận ban đầu là trình bày khá gọn gàng, mạch lạc, xem qua không bị rối hay khó hiểu.
Trong lúc xem lại một vài luồng thảo luận, mình tình cờ thấy Link XX88 nên thử ghé vào xem qua. Mình chỉ quan sát nhanh cách bố trí và trình bày tổng thể, chưa đi sâu nội dung. Cảm nhận ban đầu là trang sắp xếp khá hợp lý, nhìn gọn gàng và dễ theo dõi.
Khi xem qua một vài chia sẻ gần đây, mình để ý thấy GG88 nên tò mò ghé vào xem thử. Mình chỉ dành chút thời gian xem cách bố trí và trình bày tổng thể chứ chưa đọc kỹ nội dung. Ấn tượng ban đầu là trang được sắp xếp khá hợp lý, nhìn chung gọn gàng và dễ theo doi
Mình tình cờ bắt gặp 33win khi đọc qua vài trao đổi trên mạng, thấy nhiều người nhắc nên cũng thử mở xem lúc rảnh. Mình chỉ xem lướt qua cách bố trí, chủ yếu lướt nhanh để nắm bố cục và cách sắp xếp nội dung tổng thể. Cảm nhận ban đầu là trình bày khá gọn gàng, mạch lạc, xem qua không bị rối hay khó hieu
Hôm vừa rồi mình xem một số ý kiến chia sẻ, mình để ý thấy sun win là gì nên tò mò mở ra xem thử. chủ yếu là để xem cách trình bày và cấu trúc nội dung chứ mình chưa tìm hiểu sâu. Lướt nhanh thì thấy tổng thể khá gọn gàng, tạo cảm giác đáng tin cậy. Xem xong mình quay lại đọc tiếp các bình luận khác, chứ cũng không đào sâu thêm